The use of Artificial Intelligence without Discretion



 Credit: Netizen

The way things are unfolding in this nascent space called, 'artificial intelligence' is quite scary. Every day, you hear of a crime being committed by a single person but when reported it is addressed or credited to being done by an artificial-intelligent system, and not the human who actually committed the crime. 

This has given rise to all sorts of questions regarding who, or what governs the use of Artificial intelligent models, which are gradually changing our lives in an unprecedented way and changing our behaviour towards solving problems and dealing with issues.

Artificial intelligence is here but, what do we do with the problems already created by those who use the technology in their homes to commit crimes and are now using the technology to escape being charge or sue to court and brought before a natural way of settling disputes, which is resolving the dispute first, and responding to all matters that follows.

Now, AI is here to solve that, to some extent. But Artificial inteligence has its own limitations and what it can addresss, based on what its findings on the web and what it is served and not all the time to brings out exact thing to the user queries. Fine, the user may be satisfied with the answers given but what happens when they don't understand the points or note given by the AI system or model, as some call them, and they still want to go further but don't want to complicate things?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Simple But Dreaded Interview Question Answered

OpenAI and Nvidia Partnership: Threat or Innovation?

Is this this way to use AI?