Perplexity is being made a Scapegoat
The AI craze is still on and a lot of companies are rushing to market with half-baked products, with the hope they would complete whatever remains to be completed by using logic to fill their systems with content. Filling their models with the right content is important to meeting the queries of users of their models and if done the right way, can help them stand out.
Using someone's content with their consent or permission is a crime and a lot of companies from America, Sillicon Valley to be precise, are known for using people's content with their permission and, if found, and asked to pay damages or compensation, they deny it and look for ways to avoid making payment.
I read on the Financial Times this morning that AI company Perplexity Ai is being sued in Japan by Japanese companies Nikkei and Asahi Shimbum over copy right infringement and are asking for $15 million each in damages, and this news is circulating around the internet and bringing up questions as to who retains or holds the right of a content used by an Artificial Intelligence company.
I, for, one believe in the power of the media and the role this technology is playing in the media world and the impact it is having on our lives.
I don't recall ever giving anyone permission to use my content on AI system or model and if my content has been used on AI model to train or make it perform better then that Ai company should know they acted without my permission and I am going to file a lawsuit should I discover, or someone else discovers that my content has been or is being used to train an AI model.
.png)
Comments
Post a Comment